fionaapple20
11-27 01:05 PM
Hello, I have read about the 485 180 days rule and how one can use AC21 after 180 days have elapsed. But if one loses their job a 2 mths before the 180 days are over, is there a possibility of continuing the 485?
- Can one be unemployed and just wait out the 180 days before invoking AC21?
- Can one transfer to another employer on H1 (but let USCIS know after 180 days have elapsed)?
- Can one be unemployed and just wait out the 180 days before invoking AC21?
- Can one transfer to another employer on H1 (but let USCIS know after 180 days have elapsed)?
wallpaper Google summer of Code:
infofana
11-12 07:16 AM
I've received an answer in the WPF forum :
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/70e5bace-be65-422d-b4d7-7a4e7a866837
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/70e5bace-be65-422d-b4d7-7a4e7a866837
maalelsi
10-14 09:54 AM
It is direct deposit / stub, but company name does not show anywhere and I spoke with employees that have been there over a year and they say that is also how the W2 is printed. Company name does not show.
2011 I made a visit to Google
eastindia
11-16 04:14 PM
Share experience about Vonage about calling India.
Vonage, a provider of voice over Internet protocol phone service, has reached a settlement with Kentucky, Indiana and 30 other states over allegations of deceptive marketing and unscrupulous customer service procedures.
Under the agreement, Vonage will make �significant� changes to its marketing practices and handling of consumer cancellation requests. It also will provide refunds to eligible customers.
The company will pay the states a total of $3 million for reimbursement of legal and investigative costs. Kentucky�s portion of the reimbursement is $45,000, according to a news release from Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway�s office.
Vonage officials could not immediately be reached for comment.
Vonage was ordered to provide refunds to customers who did not receive rebates they believed they were due because their accounts weren�t open long enough to qualify or because they spent a portion of their trial periods waiting to receive or return equipment.
Refunds also will be provided to customers who were assessed excess usage charges without being informed of usage limits, received additional monthly service charges because of difficulty in canceling service, or received charges for unordered services and equipment offered as free.
Under the settlement, Holmdel, N.J.-based Vonage (NYSE: VG) must revise its disclosures for offers of free services, money-back guarantees and trial periods, according to the release. The company also must follow strict guidelines in dealing with customers wishing to cancel their service.
Through their investigation, the states found that Vonage paid bonuses to customer service representatives who retained customers. As a result, many customers had difficulty canceling their service.
Now, Vonage must record and verify conversations between customers and the company�s customer service representatives, according to the release.
Vonage customers who believe they are eligible for a refund under the settlement can call the Kentucky Attorney General�s Office of Consumer Protection hotline at (888) 432-9257, or download a complaint form at Kentucky: Attorney General Jack Conway - Forms (http://ag.ky.gov/civil/consumerprotection/complaints/forms.htm).
Vonage reaches settlement with states - Business First of Louisville: (http://louisville.bizjournals.com/louisville/stories/2009/11/16/daily11.html)
Vonage, a provider of voice over Internet protocol phone service, has reached a settlement with Kentucky, Indiana and 30 other states over allegations of deceptive marketing and unscrupulous customer service procedures.
Under the agreement, Vonage will make �significant� changes to its marketing practices and handling of consumer cancellation requests. It also will provide refunds to eligible customers.
The company will pay the states a total of $3 million for reimbursement of legal and investigative costs. Kentucky�s portion of the reimbursement is $45,000, according to a news release from Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway�s office.
Vonage officials could not immediately be reached for comment.
Vonage was ordered to provide refunds to customers who did not receive rebates they believed they were due because their accounts weren�t open long enough to qualify or because they spent a portion of their trial periods waiting to receive or return equipment.
Refunds also will be provided to customers who were assessed excess usage charges without being informed of usage limits, received additional monthly service charges because of difficulty in canceling service, or received charges for unordered services and equipment offered as free.
Under the settlement, Holmdel, N.J.-based Vonage (NYSE: VG) must revise its disclosures for offers of free services, money-back guarantees and trial periods, according to the release. The company also must follow strict guidelines in dealing with customers wishing to cancel their service.
Through their investigation, the states found that Vonage paid bonuses to customer service representatives who retained customers. As a result, many customers had difficulty canceling their service.
Now, Vonage must record and verify conversations between customers and the company�s customer service representatives, according to the release.
Vonage customers who believe they are eligible for a refund under the settlement can call the Kentucky Attorney General�s Office of Consumer Protection hotline at (888) 432-9257, or download a complaint form at Kentucky: Attorney General Jack Conway - Forms (http://ag.ky.gov/civil/consumerprotection/complaints/forms.htm).
Vonage reaches settlement with states - Business First of Louisville: (http://louisville.bizjournals.com/louisville/stories/2009/11/16/daily11.html)
more...
raydon
03-24 11:00 PM
I've heard about AC21. What is AC360 - some new USCIS provision ?
peekay
02-17 09:52 AM
I just came to know through various sources. I am not sure how much of fact there is in that information.
more...
Harivinder
04-11 01:13 PM
Hi Friends and Administrators,
I have a suggestion. I am sure the administrators here have much better ideas than mine but I would request administrators to please read this suggestion with an open mind. It might be useful for the community.
I am sure we have enough members working for big companies like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Intel etc. The past experiences tell us that congress listens to these companies more than us even if we are making a valid point on the legal immigration issues. The irony here is that these companied care for H1 visa expansion not green card quota expansion. These big companies do not realize the benefit of green card quota expansion to them.
Let me prove how. A large proportion of the immigration community is working for small companies as consultants. Their immigration status makes changing jobs very difficult. Now I am sure if the people stuck in GC process get there GC thousands of people will not be forced to work for consultant companies and will look for permanent jobs. And these big companies are sitting on the top of the most desired companies to work for. These thousands of consultants will be more than happy to work for these big companies after they get there GC.
My point here is that if we can have these Companies speak for us, our voices can be heard by congress.
How this can be done: If immigrants working for these companies as consultants or permanent can start a chain of email and send a signed copy with hundred of signatures to the management, management might think of putting these points across to congress.
The contents of this email should be simple and achievable. Like
1. Recapture of unused Visas.
2. Get rid of the country quota. (This one is difficult but very beneficial).
3. Except US graduates form quota. (This one is controversial in IV community, but if US graduates are out of the quota every one is benefited. US graduates will be benefited more, but others will be benefited because there will be less number of people to share the quota. I mention this one because this point can get big support for the universities also, and I am sure congress does not ignore a voice coming form the universities.
About increasing the quota it is difficult and will not help much if the country quota is still exists.
If the email submitted to the management contain thousands of signatures from immigrants working for here company and people who support these immigrants in the company management and people like Bill Gates might talk to the congress to hemp us.
May be it is 2 cents suggestion but I would like the administrators to think out it with a open mind.
Thanks,
I have a suggestion. I am sure the administrators here have much better ideas than mine but I would request administrators to please read this suggestion with an open mind. It might be useful for the community.
I am sure we have enough members working for big companies like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Intel etc. The past experiences tell us that congress listens to these companies more than us even if we are making a valid point on the legal immigration issues. The irony here is that these companied care for H1 visa expansion not green card quota expansion. These big companies do not realize the benefit of green card quota expansion to them.
Let me prove how. A large proportion of the immigration community is working for small companies as consultants. Their immigration status makes changing jobs very difficult. Now I am sure if the people stuck in GC process get there GC thousands of people will not be forced to work for consultant companies and will look for permanent jobs. And these big companies are sitting on the top of the most desired companies to work for. These thousands of consultants will be more than happy to work for these big companies after they get there GC.
My point here is that if we can have these Companies speak for us, our voices can be heard by congress.
How this can be done: If immigrants working for these companies as consultants or permanent can start a chain of email and send a signed copy with hundred of signatures to the management, management might think of putting these points across to congress.
The contents of this email should be simple and achievable. Like
1. Recapture of unused Visas.
2. Get rid of the country quota. (This one is difficult but very beneficial).
3. Except US graduates form quota. (This one is controversial in IV community, but if US graduates are out of the quota every one is benefited. US graduates will be benefited more, but others will be benefited because there will be less number of people to share the quota. I mention this one because this point can get big support for the universities also, and I am sure congress does not ignore a voice coming form the universities.
About increasing the quota it is difficult and will not help much if the country quota is still exists.
If the email submitted to the management contain thousands of signatures from immigrants working for here company and people who support these immigrants in the company management and people like Bill Gates might talk to the congress to hemp us.
May be it is 2 cents suggestion but I would like the administrators to think out it with a open mind.
Thanks,
2010 A Google spokesman issued the
delta3110
02-02 11:23 PM
I am in H1 status and my wife is in H4 status. She received credit for an amount for which she received an 1042-S form. Also received a 1098-T form which shows the credit amount. Where do I show the amount in the 1040 or 1040 EZ ?
more...
![google 1996 logo. Logo. [Google]](http://cg.scs.carleton.ca/~luc/AnhHeeStran--Logo-2010.jpg "Logo. [Google]"){kind=logo}
thakurrajiv
09-17 12:16 PM
This is interesting. Do you know more about the program ?
The website has very little info. They want $75 fee to get started.
Is there info on who offers the degree, how many courses need to be taken, how long does it take etc ?
The website has very little info. They want $75 fee to get started.
Is there info on who offers the degree, how many courses need to be taken, how long does it take etc ?
hair Facebook feels Google may
vallabhu
08-26 11:36 AM
Hi Guys,
I have an appeal Pending with AAO for a denied I140 EB3 India 2004, If I withdraw my appeal and refile I140 I know I will loose pending I485 application. but will have ability to extend my h1 in november showing the refiled I140?
I have an appeal Pending with AAO for a denied I140 EB3 India 2004, If I withdraw my appeal and refile I140 I know I will loose pending I485 application. but will have ability to extend my h1 in november showing the refiled I140?
more...
sk2006
05-25 01:23 AM
Can anyone tell me what is ADIT processing?
I am assuming that you got 485 approval letter and it talks about ADIT.
I think there was a long and detailed reply by somebody on this forum about ADIT
Do some research and PLEASE put complete details in the post if you want a meaningful answer.
I am assuming that you got 485 approval letter and it talks about ADIT.
I think there was a long and detailed reply by somebody on this forum about ADIT
Do some research and PLEASE put complete details in the post if you want a meaningful answer.
hot The Google logo marks the
ssharma
06-30 05:06 PM
Here is a memo from one of the law firms, I found on the net.
http://www.michaelpiston.net/documents/m/changing%20employer%20after%20I-485%20is%20approved.pdf
After digging thro' forums it seems everyone talks about having the "intention" of staying with the Employer after GC.
Here's my question.
- Should the "intention" be on the day of filing 485 or the day you get GC ? (a date in future that no one can predict).
If the "intention" has to be at the time of 485 filing then, after 180 days of filing 485 one should be able to change employers, irrespective of the case being approved or NOT.
thoughts/comments ??
http://www.michaelpiston.net/documents/m/changing%20employer%20after%20I-485%20is%20approved.pdf
After digging thro' forums it seems everyone talks about having the "intention" of staying with the Employer after GC.
Here's my question.
- Should the "intention" be on the day of filing 485 or the day you get GC ? (a date in future that no one can predict).
If the "intention" has to be at the time of 485 filing then, after 180 days of filing 485 one should be able to change employers, irrespective of the case being approved or NOT.
thoughts/comments ??
more...
house Chinese flag blows in the air covering the Google logo outside the Google
amitga
01-25 09:37 AM
Even GC cannot work on security Clearance projects. Only Citizens allowed.
tattoo that Google intended
aaron
08-22 01:40 PM
Application Type: I131 , APPLICATION FOR USCIS TRAVEL DOCUMENT
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
AC21 case
AP : May13RD
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
AC21 case
AP : May13RD
more...
pictures A Chinese flag blows in the air below the Google logo outside the Google
sankap
07-25 03:34 PM
She definitely would have issues if plan to travel in TN visa. TN visa is not supposed to have any immigration intent.
The best thing to do is change her status to parolee and start working using EAD. There is no reason for her to continue in TN status, after filing 485.
-Morchu
I agree w/ Morch: TN, unlike H1B, is not a dual-intent visa. Change to EAD/AP.
The best thing to do is change her status to parolee and start working using EAD. There is no reason for her to continue in TN status, after filing 485.
-Morchu
I agree w/ Morch: TN, unlike H1B, is not a dual-intent visa. Change to EAD/AP.
dresses between Amazon, Google,
PD_Dec2002
07-06 04:33 PM
Can someone tell me what these compliance dates for I-485 from NSC and TSC mean from this USCIS bulletin (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ReceiptingTimes06Jul07.pdf)?
How do I interpret the I-485 dates of 08/01/07 for NSC and 07/20/07 for TSC?
Thanks,
Jayant
How do I interpret the I-485 dates of 08/01/07 for NSC and 07/20/07 for TSC?
Thanks,
Jayant
more...
makeup Logo. [Google]
gc28262
03-15 11:26 PM
Please see the link.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?b=39
The new job has to be same or similar irrespective of whether you transfer on EAD or H1.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?b=39
The new job has to be same or similar irrespective of whether you transfer on EAD or H1.
girlfriend New Logo designed in 1996
dano
05-05 10:58 AM
thanks!
hairstyles The Google logo
guchi472000
12-08 08:06 PM
Good Morning.....
sbmallik
07-01 03:40 PM
Good luck on your H-1B transfer ... in the worst scenario you have 10 days.
gc_check
06-21 07:32 PM
Hi, I recently got married to an American Citizen. I am Canadian citizen and on travel visa here. I filed my I-485 jut last week. My question is how long does it take to get permanent resident approval?
Since you got married to a us citizen, the entire process is much faster and you must have the green card in less than 6 or utmost 9 months.
Since you got married to a us citizen, the entire process is much faster and you must have the green card in less than 6 or utmost 9 months.
No comments:
Post a Comment